Daily Junction Play
769watching now
Sky News 15 Jul 2026 55 here now

Will Andy Burnham nationalise Thames Water?

Thames Water has warned funding is due to dry up by November and further money will be dependent on the views of incoming PM Andy Burnham, as its major lenders seek to shore up its financial future.

For You

Because of what you watch

Comments (20)

Daily Junction discussion mixed with clearly attributed comments from the original video provider.

Join in — free. Comments on Daily Junction are for members, so real names stay rare and bots stay out.

One field. We email you a 6-digit code — no password needed. Your comment is kept while you do it.

Under 13? You’ll need a parent’s OK first — it takes them one click.

@
Absolutely fantastic idea! Gift a fortune to people who have made a fortune out of blatantly robbing us and gift them a financial pat on the back!
@
Nearly £200/year in standing charges (53.4p/day) before we even consume any water
@
Not enough details where the costs are. For example split the last mile ownership into townships and concentrate the costs locally. Grid ownership appears a national security item, but the providers of clean water and sewage processors could still be private.
@
How much did they pay people and execs and bonuses? Most important question!! Why skip this spend when it’s the largest
@
Sue the ceos ,the largest shareholders, incompetence and embezzlement !!!,
@
The company that borrowed against the Thames water before selling it needs to answer for this.
@
Thatcher initiated this privatisation of essentials, it was a huge mistake and now we see the proof. Whatever the government does the tax payers are going to have to pay, where is the money to come from? The bond markets are not happy with yet more borrowing, consumers are being whacked on their bills, no one wants more taxes but there may be no choice.
@
The estimates of the cost of nationalizing Thames Water range from £0 to £99 bn. Sky News has misreported here by mentioning only the upper ceiling of the cost (£100 bn). Moreover, if the UK had a law to make shareholders and bondholders pay for harm they leave (a “bail in” provision), the 'total value' of the company would become negative (-£26 bn), but since we don't, the 'appropriate value' is £0.
@
Our generations having to pick up the predictable consequences of thatcherism 😠
@
People don't appreciate just how fundamentally screwed our previously nationalised industries have become and just how expensive it will be to reset them to where they once were before the thatcher massacre
@
@TheVesko95 From YouTube ↗ 16 Jul 2026 29
If a company goes bust then it's value is 0 ... why is it different for themes water? Just let it go bust and then nationalise.

When a company goes bust everyone looses money that is literally how it works ...
@
Can't let the grifters extract even more money out of it, let it go bust first then buy it for a symbolic pound
@
Not going to mention to billions paid out in dividends over the last 10 year???
Laking context in this video
@
Don't pay them stupid money, they're bankrupt, let them go bust and aquire the assets cheap
@
@nikk6368 From YouTube ↗ 16 Jul 2026 9
Chris Weston should not have a house, a car, a suit, take everything, the way hes taken clean water from all of us.
@
Can someone explain how many water providers there currently are in central London to compete with TW….Oh wait, none? Wow, what a great use of the free market…and what a win for privatisation where there are no market forces keeping them competitive.
@
@dddddbbb From YouTube ↗ 16 Jul 2026 64
Market value of water companies is often zero due to how...under water...they are.
@
Sky have skipped over a number of facts here. Why thames water is in so much debt. The stockholders placed the company in debt to finance payouts. Additionally, there is legislation in place to allow failing services to be renationalised.
@
Absolutely - it must be nationalised.
@
privatising critical essentials is insanity.