Sixteen and 17-year-olds will face an overnight social media curfew and the disabling of addictive features under government plans – but critics say it won't achieve anything as the settings can be tu
People stay into the AM because of school sometimes, some people's brains either just work differently or that the workload is just that heavy. In this case, it would mean they would spend the entire day on social media and then go back to their work when it's curfew time. Somehow, I feel this isn't a good solution, and mabye find the root cause to focus on instead.
As long as the average teenager accepts that at least 95% of the stuff that gets posted online is a load of crap, like the rest of us, surely after that it wouldn't matter what time of the day the average teenager reads any of the crap!
How messed up is Labours thinking, they are happy to give puberty blockers to 11 year olds, because they say can think for themselves but a 17 year-old can be miss-led if online.
What might these teenagers do with their time if denied social media? Setting fires in the nearby countryside, I'll wager.
We use cookies, device fingerprinting and cross-device tracking to personalise content, serve targeted advertising, and analyse how you use our site across your devices. By clicking Accept all you consent to the use of these tracking technologies. Your data may be used to build a profile of your interests and show you personalised ads on other sites.
Privacy policy
Comments (19)
Daily Junction discussion mixed with clearly attributed comments from the original video provider.
Join in — free. Comments on Daily Junction are for members, so real names stay rare and bots stay out.
One field. We email you a 6-digit code — no password needed. Your comment is kept while you do it.
Under 13? You’ll need a parent’s OK first — it takes them one click.
🗣️SLAVERY