Daily Junction Play
784watching now
Science vs Cinema 9 Aug 2025 20 here now

Astrophysicist Reviews FANTASTIC 4 FIRST STEPS | Science vs Cinema

Astrophysicist Andy Howell looks at Marvel's FANTASTIC FOUR FIRST STEPS as a springboard for explorations of science and evaluates some of the scientific and technological aspects of the film.

INTRO

For You

Because of what you watch

Comments (20)

Daily Junction discussion mixed with clearly attributed comments from the original video provider.

Join in — free. Comments on Daily Junction are for members, so real names stay rare and bots stay out.

One field. We email you a 6-digit code — no password needed. Your comment is kept while you do it.

Under 13? You’ll need a parent’s OK first — it takes them one click.

@
Cats are also only limited to the size of their head in getting through holes and tight spaces. Source: My 3 mischievous troublemakers 😂😻
@
Science 🧬 fic or science 🧬 fantasy genres? 😮😮😮
@
15:50 johnny is not a dumb superhero. he is the least intelligent in a group that has one of the best human spaceship pilot, a master physicist and the smartest man in marvel universe.
@
not an astrophysicist but as a hobbyist with an interest in this stuff, isnt it absurd that they had plans to just... place the earth in a new solar system? assuming it's even possible (big assumption) they'd need to find a star extremely similar to the sun or else face an extinction level event due to the extreme difference in heat, light etc which the Earth's atmosphere wouldn't be adequate for. then there's orbits to consider; there's heaps of other objects in our solar system that influence what we know as a stable orbit. perhaps most important of all of those is the moon; they didn't transport the moon too, and without its gravitational influence (among other things) do we just not have tides anymore? wouldnt that lowkey destroy our marine ecology and heavily impact the climate?

would love your much more educated input!
@
I just watched this on Disney+ and although it was an enjoyable movie the bad science took me out of it several times and I'm so glad I found this video!

Just one to add coming from an ObGyn background - I know they're cosmic mutants but a heavily pregnant woman should NOT be in space around all that radiation (among many other reasons)!
@
Okay, props for thoroughness. Much of the science has to be out of expertise and still you did the research to extreme detail. Great video.
@
I suffered 3rd degrees burns watching this video.
@
Déjà vu
@
I can't imagine who this episode was for - not fans, not aspirational scientists

to be for them

what break-hroughs would be necessary to make the science of the film real?

4 Technologies from FF that are on the horizon
@
Funniest thing is that you look a lot like Mr Fantastic from the comics. And i mean that as a compliment haha. Are you sure you do not actually stretch?
@
Damn, I have already watch half of this video in short form. 😥
@
You’re forgetting one worm hole or a form of teleportation and teleportation can take many forms but I’ll give you a pass because we’re not sure how many method of teleportation there are because technically teleportation is just the ability to travel without moving
@
A bird arsonist?

Dang
@
@redrei9 From YouTube ↗ 23 Aug 2025 1
Thanks for highlighting the flawed plotlines and loopholes.
@
What about TIME DIALATION??? I was hoping for an analysis on that! How can they come back to earth and be like no time has passed?
@
Please review Armageddon! I heard it has over 100 unrealistic details.
@
Suggestions for reviews/reactions:
The Black Hole (1979)
Event Horizon (1997)

Gravity (2013)

Interstellar (2014)

2001: A Space Odyssey (1968)
2010: The Year We Make Contact (1984)

Contact (1997)
Solaris (1972)
Superman (2025)
Primer (2004)

Games:
Kerbal Space Program
Orbiter
Deliver Us the Moon
Deliver Us Mars
Moons of Madness
The Invincible
@
@sccur From YouTube ↗ 23 Aug 2025 3
How is this channel not bigger! I love your content. It'd be great to see more of this. And maybe even some connections between your points and some deeper supporting material in the comments?
@
>disappears for a year
>drops this vid randomly

Nice
@
@ricksaco From YouTube ↗ 23 Aug 2025 12
Totally agreed, but you forget talk about the time paradox when you travel close to speed light, or the 4 months that you need to achieve that velocity accelerating constantly at 4g.