Daily Junction Play
696watching now
Science vs Cinema 26 Mar 2020 35 here now

Star Trek: PICARD | Science vs Cinema

In our biggest episode yet, astrophysicist Andy Howell reviews the science of the latest Star Trek series PICARD, including interviews with Sir Patrick Stewart, Jeri Ryan, Marina Sirtis and the rest o

For You

Because of what you watch

Comments (20)

Daily Junction discussion mixed with clearly attributed comments from the original video provider.

Join in — free. Comments on Daily Junction are for members, so real names stay rare and bots stay out.

One field. We email you a 6-digit code — no password needed. Your comment is kept while you do it.

Under 13? You’ll need a parent’s OK first — it takes them one click.

@
Shoutout to my professor and anyone else whos watching this for class today🙏🙏🙏
@
Wasn't Romulus like one of hundreds of planets of the Romulan Empire? Ok, it was a "capital" so its destruction would hurt but I think they could handle it without any help from the Federation.
@
An important thing I think you missed in the synthahol segment is Data specifically said "on Starships", where synthahol is necessary due to you being able to shrug off its effects in an emergency, meaning it's not so much frowned upon in civilian settings, just in military-esque ones
@
Is this channel dead ? I wish it would do a video on the new movie "Greenland"
@
OK< if you are going to do Science vs. cinema, you have to do an episode on The Expanse....
@
Please do interstellar!
@
Min.11. The prequel novel The Last Best Hope establishes the Romulus government knew of the supernova, but chose to ignore the scientist's warnings, show no weakness, ask for no help, and lie to the people.
Sounds familiar.
Min.12. Syntehol is served in starships. Starfleet starships, where people has to be sober 24/7. But every kind of hard liquor pops here and there everywhere.
@
Thank you so much for this. An amazing interview, very well done, love to learn more about the actual science and potential of things.
@
Oh boy, you guys will be disappointed by Picard if you see it from the science point of view, and if you see it expecting that anybody hold any appearance of who they were in the originals series. All the lore is lost, everybody is just somebody else and behaves completely different. Don't get me wrong, is not bad per say, it is that they didn't care not even a bit about the original story, lore, characters or even science, for example now androids can mind meld.... yeah, you read that right.
@
Just a comment, "La Serena"is not the Siren. It means Sereen, or calm, so totally another meaning of what it is shown in this video. ;)
@
@Bestape From YouTube ↗ 23 Jul 2020 3
Thank you for this video, I enjoyed it! I'm kind of surprised by the other comments, honestly. You're doing a good job. --> I really quite liked the latter half of Star Trek: PICARD Season 1. I was pleased with their exploration of Raffi's various struggles and touched by their association of the butterfly with the golem. I appreciate their take on mortality and the orchids. Chris was cool but hopefully they can flesh out Elnor beyond Legolas-meets-golden-retriever in the next season. They seem to be eerily mirroring the real-world development of artificial life (compared to AI) but I've come to expect that kind of thing from the philosophical side of Star Trek storytellers. Keep on inspiring us to self-actualize! Cheers, -Kyle
@
The "recreate a mind from a single neuron" thing bugged me the most.
@
Uhm, methane is flammable... in an oxygen atmosphere. You know, the kind Mars doesn't have.
@
Too bad Alex kurtzman doesn't have a writing advisor
@
I'm surprised you haven't done "Gravity".
@
Correction the Sythahol is for people serving on Starships and Bases and/or Active Federation/Starfleet Personal!!!!
@
:O This video needs more views!
@
Huh. I didn’t think the necklace with the neuronic cloning symbol transitioning to space meant anything, but that was a cool idea.
@
Thanks for the video. Your enthusiasm was great. Surprised at the negative comments here. Trekkie fans seem hard to please.
@
You should review mini series Devs, it has very smart premise: quantum computer is so powerful, it can use present date to reconstruction past and predict future.